Reading Dillard’s story about her encounter with a weasel was difficult for me to enjoy. The skill of strong open form style of writing is something I could never envision myself comfortable in obtaining. The underlying meaning of her story seemed deep and as if it could be interpreted to each their own way.
I believe the point that Dillard was trying to convey was how she admired the weasel’s simplicity. Near her closing she states, “a weasel lives as he’s meant to, yielding at every moment to the perfect freedom of single necessity”. This implies to me that respect was held for one who is able to live their life successfully accomplishing necessities. Most of us attempt to perform many things at a time, and usually can do this adequately. The weasel on the other hand, focuses on one necessity at a time and will perform to perfection, even with death.
The depth of this writing was quite intent. The amount of meaning and description that was taken from a brief encounter with a weasel was enormous. While trying to interpret the gist of this story was uncomfortable for me, I did try to appreciate a different style of writing than I am familiar with.